Legislature(2013 - 2014)
2013-03-04 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2013-03-04 House Journal Page 0436 HB 77 CSHB 77(RES) was before the House with Amendment No. 1 (page 434) moved and pending. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 77(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Gruenberg, Herron, Josephson, Kerttula, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Chenault, Costello, Feige, Gattis, Hawker, Higgins, Holmes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Guttenberg, Hughes, LeDoux Absent: Kawasaki And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. 2013-03-04 House Journal Page 0437 Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Tarr: Page 21, lines 15 - 24: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 22, lines 12 - 30: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 23, line 13: Delete "Section 45" Insert "Section 43" Page 23, line 14: Delete "sec. 47" Insert "sec. 45" Representative Tarr moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Feige objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 77(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Drummond, Edgmon, Gara, Gruenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr, Tuck, P.Wilson Nays: Chenault, Costello, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, T.Wilson 2013-03-04 House Journal Page 0438 Excused: Guttenberg, Hughes, LeDoux And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Josephson: Page 6, line 23: Delete "substantially and" Page 10, line 1: Delete "A substantially and" Insert "An" Page 11, line 6: Delete "substantially and" Page 11, line 26: Delete "A substantially and" Insert "An" Page 18, line 7: Delete ", or substantially and" Insert "or is" Page 18, line 16: Delete "substantially and" Page 19, line 4: Delete "substantially and" Page 19, line 6: Delete "substantial and" Page 19, line 8: Delete "substantial and" Representative Josephson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. 2013-03-04 House Journal Page 0439 Representative Saddler objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 77(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Drummond, Edgmon, Gara, Gruenberg, Herron, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Kreiss-Tomkins, Munoz, Nageak, Seaton, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Higgins, Holmes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Guttenberg, Hughes, LeDoux And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representatives Kreiss-Tomkins and Gara: Page 21, line 16: Delete "or" Page 21, line 17, following "States": Insert ", or a Native entity in the state that is on the list of Indian entities that are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, published in 67 Federal Register 46328-01 on July 12, 2002," Representative Kreiss-Tomkins moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Feige objected. 2013-03-04 House Journal Page 0440 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 77(RES) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Gruenberg, Herron, Holmes, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Kreiss-Tomkins, Munoz, Nageak, Seaton, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Chenault, Costello, Feige, Gattis, Hawker, Higgins, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Guttenberg, Hughes, LeDoux And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. CSHB 77(RES) was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall CSHB 77(RES) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 77(RES) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 23 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Chenault, Costello, Feige, Gattis, Hawker, Higgins, Holmes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Nays: Austerman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Gruenberg, Herron, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Kreiss-Tomkins, Seaton, Tarr, Tuck Excused: Guttenberg, Hughes, LeDoux And so, CSHB 77(RES) passed the House. 2013-03-04 House Journal Page 0441 Representative Pruitt moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 77(RES) Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 31 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Gruenberg, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Kerttula, Kreiss-Tomkins, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Nays: Drummond, Gara, Josephson, Kawasaki, Tarr, Tuck Excused: Guttenberg, Hughes, LeDoux And so, the effective date clause was adopted. CSHB 77(RES) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.